artificial grass, carnival festoons, fireworks,
theatre lights with green gels, 7 large sheets of glass, loudspeaker,
cellar room, tunnel, map of the garden, 7 white flags, a fairy tale
dismantling fireworks, making paper flags, conversing with audience
additional performer: James Stringer
|
| 
1 February 1997
Cambridge
Dear Melanie
...............
The site was not inspiring, despite its name - a walled garden, really
it was a scrubby little paved backyard with a few flower beds at the back
of a very uninspiring small town 'safe' Arts Centre. ............. It
was not a space that had a life or a history, there was no sense of it
being 'used' or valued rather that it was made 'use of'. The only redeeming
feature was the flight of steps from the garden which led down to a tunnel
about 30ft long and from which you could gain access to a small dark and
dank cellar room.
Dissatisfaction, that's what I feel right now, when I think about Episode
8, dissatisfaction with the site and with the work that we made there.
Bridgwater itself - at first sight, an unremarkable, rather grotty small
Somerset town - considerable rural poverty and deprivation. .........
Our two week residency began in early September - the newspapers and every
discussion and conversation inevitably included mention of the hopes and
excitement generated by the announcement of the IRA ceasefire. And then
we discovered through delving in the library that Bridgwater's history
is irrevocably linked with the English Civil war - the last battle of
that war was fought just outside Bridgwater on Westonzoyland. We also
discovered that the most interesting aspect of Bridgwater's cultural life
was not located in its Arts Centre but in its tradition of an annual carnival
procession and fireworks display which dismisses Guy Fawkes and takes
over the town in early November.
On the outskirts of the town in disused garages and warehouses there are
various Carnival Clubs which compete with each other to create the best
float in the procession. The preparations take all year and practically
every working class family in the area is involved in some way. I shall
never forget going to visit one of the club huts where that year's float
was being constructed - it was dark, we parked in a muddy little car park,
in the distance there was fire burning which lit up the edge of the large
warehouse. Inside there was a fearful racket, loads of men hammering,
welding and installing thousands of lights onto the carnival float. It
was surreal - I could not connect this world with the dismal one that
I was seeing each day on the streets of the town - it seemed as if every
ounce of colour, excitement, life and hope was being carefully hidden
and saved for one day in the town's year.
So clearly, despite my initial dissatisfaction there was an awful lot
to respond to coming from the site itself. For ourselves, the most pressing
personal issue was the conflict between our roles as mothers and artists
and the effect that it was having on Paul and Weaver and the kids. The
sheer intensity of our workload over that year was affecting them as well
as us...................
Conflict, whether national civil war or domestic strife seemed to be the
point of connection between us and the site.
The last episode had looked at hopes and aspirations. We were talking
about conflict and hopes for resolution, when you have to fight for what
you want and when you get it - is it what you imagined?, is it worth it?
is there disappointment? is there dissatisfaction? is there regret? Can
fairy tales come true?
We decided to turn the garden into a bright and shiny, but artificial
space, lit with carnival festoons, carpeted with artificial grass and
extra illumination from green theatre lights to make even the natural
plants seem unreal. We set up 7 vertical sheets of glass, like ghosts
of gravestones, sometimes barely visible depending on the angle you viewed
them from they made the garden into a hazardous space.
The association of 'fairy tale' that came up for us from the space led
us to ask Weaver to write a story for the Episode based on the fairy tale
form. We gave him a set of ideas to work from - ............
A few days later he faxed us "A Fairy tale for Torn Families",
we recorded our voices reading it and it was played over a tinny tannoy
system into the garden and the text was also displayed on the walls of
the ante room.
In the cellar room, throughout the two hours of performance I systematically
dissected and disarmed firework rockets wearing a face mask and plastic
gloves. I then cut a small square from an enlarged map of the garden and
on the reverse wrote an extract from the fairytale. The square was then
attached to the rocket stick to make it into a flag which you collected
periodically and placed next to one of the gravestones. The action was
intended to be ambiguous was I collecting the gunpowder to make a lethal
bomb? or was I disarming the rockets and transforming them into messages
(flags) of peace?. Was my presence in the cellar hopeful or threatening?.
(Much of the discussion in the media following the ceasefire was centring
on the IRA's arsenal and the need for disarmament.)
There was a major reversal in our performance concerns and a step backward
in that my element was task based and non-interactive. You fully took
on the role of mediator with the audience and whilst you also had a framed
performance task (collecting and placing the flags). I think that at the
heart of my dissatisfaction with this episode is that I completely missed
out on the interaction with the viewers - I have no sense of their reactions
and responses and can only rely on your version of their interaction with
you.
I began this letter by using the word dissatisfaction a lot, now that
I have written this letter about Episode 8 I realise that dissatisfaction
was what this Episode was 'about' rather than what I feel about it.
I also feel that despite all its flaws it was absolutely right for the
audience that we wanted to speak to in Bridgwater. We weren't particularly
interested in the usual Arts Centre crowd - we wanted to make contact
with the people we saw in the shopping arcade and with the creativity
and enthusiasm that they invested in the Carnival. An unsophisticated
audience, not even comfortable with craft exhibitions and amateur dramatics
plays. We put a lot of effort into drawing them in and provoking their
curiosity. We handed out fliers in the shopping arcade - we literally
threw open the doors and put a sandwich board out on the street, we caught
people on the way home from work and shopping, we used an entrance which
did not take them through the Arts Centre but down a short dark corridor
which was illuminated at one end by carnival festoons which literally
drew them in. We were very successful - we were overwhelmed by visitors
and they were at times frustrated by the time limit we had to impose on
their stay in the garden (because of safety) - they wanted to stay longer,
they wanted to talk with you and hear the end of the story.
Episode 8 - The Walled Garden was simple, unsophisticated, maybe not very
adventurous and limited by our tiredness and lack of initial inspiration
from the actual site BUT it perhaps was the episode where we really integrated
the key elements of The Zwillinge Project process which we have since
focussed upon. The material came from the a) the site itself b) what was
happening in the world at that time c) our personal concerns AND we were
absolutely clear about our target audience. We knew who we wanted to speak
to and I know that we did speak to them.
...................
Kirsten
from a series of letters written by the artists on each episode |